Maryland School Choice 2026: BOOST, HB 1204, ESA, and What Actually Exists

Maryland's school choice landscape is, to put it plainly, thin. If you are a middle-class family in Howard County or Montgomery County who wants to use state funds to support a private school, microschool, or homeschool program, the current answer from Annapolis is mostly no. Understanding exactly what does exist — and what was proposed — prevents families from either missing available programs or building plans around funding that has not passed.

What Currently Exists: The BOOST Scholarship

Maryland's primary school choice program is the BOOST scholarship (Broadening Options and Opportunities for Students Today). BOOST is an income-restricted scholarship that provides state funds for nonpublic school tuition.

The critical limitation: BOOST is not a universal school choice program. Eligibility is tied to the federal free- and reduced-price school meals (FARMs) guidelines, and the student must be enrolled or accepted at a participating nonpublic school. For the vast majority of Maryland families searching for school choice options, BOOST is not available.

Funding is limited, so MSDE cannot provide scholarships to every qualified applicant; priority can go to previous BOOST recipients and their siblings. Families should use the published application window rather than assume funding is available indefinitely.

Homeschoolers have limited access to BOOST. A family operating under Maryland's standard home-instruction framework (COMAR 13A.10.01) does not use BOOST directly; eligibility requires enrollment or acceptance at a participating nonpublic school that meets MSDE's program requirements.

HB 1204: What the Proposal Would Have Done

House Bill 1204 was an Education Savings Account Program proposal. It would have deposited state funds into managed accounts for qualifying families to use for tuition, curriculum, tutoring, and other approved educational expenses.

This model mirrors what Arizona, Florida, Arkansas, and other states have implemented with varying degrees of universality. Arizona's program allows broad K-12 participation. Maryland's proposal was more targeted, though the specifics of eligibility thresholds and per-student amounts evolved through the legislative process.

HB 1204 was withdrawn by its sponsor on March 16, 2026, and did not become law. That status matters more than the political speculation surrounding the proposal: there is no ESA funding under HB 1204 on which a microschool can rely.

The practical implication: do not build a microschool's financial model around HB 1204 funding. Any future ESA proposal would need separate legislation, regulations, and program requirements.

Maryland Homeschool Reimbursement: What Does Not Exist

Maryland does not currently have a homeschool reimbursement program in the sense that some other states have. There is no state mechanism that reimburses homeschooling families for curriculum, materials, or instructional costs simply by virtue of being a registered home instruction family.

What does exist at the margins:

Dual enrollment discounts: Maryland homeschooled students (operating under either Option 1 or Option 2) are eligible for a mandated 25% to 32.5% tuition discount on credit-bearing courses at Maryland community colleges. Carroll Community College offers a 32.5% discount; Howard Community College has the state's lowest baseline tuition. For high school-aged students in a microschool program, dual enrollment is effectively a form of state subsidy on college credit.

Tax considerations: Maryland does not offer a state income tax credit or deduction specifically for homeschool expenses. Federal education credits and deductions have limited applicability to K-12 homeschool costs. Some microschool founders operating as formal businesses may have deductible business expenses, but this is a business tax issue, not a homeschool reimbursement program.

529 plans for K-12 expenses: Federal rules allow qualified 529 distributions for up to $20,000 per beneficiary per year for K-12 tuition in 2026. Whether a microschool or learning pod qualifies for a particular withdrawal, and how Maryland treats that distribution, depends on how the program is structured and should be verified with the plan administrator or a tax professional.

The Structural Problem Maryland Families Face

Maryland's school choice situation is fundamentally different from states that have enacted broad ESA programs. In Arizona, a family who withdraws their child to homeschool can access state funds to cover curriculum and tutor costs. In Florida, several scholarship programs provide thousands of dollars per student to qualifying families regardless of income. Maryland has done none of this.

The result is a self-funding market. Middle- and upper-middle-class Maryland families who want alternative education — microschools, learning pods, hybrid models — are paying entirely out of pocket. This is one reason the pod cost-sharing model has taken hold in the state's affluent suburbs: when there is no public subsidy, pooling private resources is the most rational economic approach.

This also shapes how Maryland microschool founders should think about their legal and financial structure. Because families are self-funding, they are more sensitive to value and more likely to scrutinize whether a pod is actually providing what it promises. The documentation requirements — COMAR-compliant portfolios, parent agreements with clear financial terms, liability waivers — are not bureaucratic formalities. They are the professional infrastructure that distinguishes a pod that retains families from one that falls apart mid-year over a dispute about tuition or educational quality.

What to Watch in the 2026 Legislative Session

The BOOST scholarship has limited funding. Families who qualify should apply during the published window — for the 2026–2027 school year, MSDE lists March 9 through May 8, 2026.

HB 1204 was withdrawn in the 2026 session. If Maryland considers a future ESA proposal, its legislation and regulations will determine which microschool arrangements qualify; founders should not assume that an informal cooperative would be eligible.

The 2025 MSDE regulatory review identified COMAR 13A.10.01, the core home instruction regulation, for potential amendment or repeal. More than 2,500 comments were submitted in the public comment period, overwhelmingly urging the state to maintain the current flexible framework. Any proposed changes would proceed through separate rulemaking and could shape the compliance landscape for pods and cooperatives.

For founders launching a microschool or pod in 2026, the current flexibility in Maryland law is an asset that may not last indefinitely. Operating with full legal compliance now — including properly filed Notices of Intent, documented portfolios, and written parent agreements — positions a pod to withstand any regulatory tightening that follows.

The Maryland Micro-School & Pod Kit is built for the current compliance framework, with documentation designed to satisfy Maryland's portfolio review requirements and protect founders under the existing regulatory environment. Regardless of whether Maryland adopts a future ESA proposal, the operational foundation it provides is what keeps a pod running professionally and legally as the legislative landscape shifts.

See more Maryland guides →