Alaska Homeschool Individual Learning Plan: What It Is and How to Write One

If you are enrolling your child in an Alaska correspondence school program for the first time, one of the first requirements you will encounter is the Individual Learning Plan — usually called the ILP. It is not a test, not a formal assessment, and not a bureaucratic trap. It is a planning document you develop in collaboration with your advisory teacher at the start of each school year.

That said, first-time correspondence school families often feel uncertain about what the ILP actually requires, how detailed it needs to be, and what happens if your plans change mid-year. This post answers those questions clearly.

What the ILP Is

The Individual Learning Plan is the foundational document for your child's correspondence school year. Alaska law requires that correspondence school students have an ILP on file with their program, and each program has its own form and process for completing it.

At its core, the ILP describes three things: what your child will study, what curriculum or resources you plan to use, and what educational goals you have for the year. It is forward-looking — you write it at the start of the year based on your plans, not at the end of the year as a report of what happened.

The ILP serves a legal and administrative function: it documents that your child is receiving an education, that you have a plan, and that the correspondence program is providing adequate oversight. This matters because Alaska's correspondence school system exists within the public school framework — the state is allocating per-pupil funding on the basis that these students are receiving a legitimate education.

Who Develops the ILP With You

Your advisory teacher is the program-assigned educator who works with your family throughout the year. Developing the ILP is typically a collaborative process that happens in a meeting or series of conversations with your advisor at the start of each school year — or when you first enroll if you join mid-year.

The advisory teacher is not there to dictate your curriculum or second-guess your educational choices. In practice, most advisory teachers in Alaska's correspondence programs are supportive of parent-led learning and work constructively with a wide range of educational approaches. Their role is to review your plan, confirm it is educationally sound and compliant with program requirements, and sign off on it.

For families who are new to correspondence school, the advisory teacher is also a valuable resource for understanding what purchases are approvable through the allotment — which is directly connected to what you put in the ILP, since the allotment is meant to fund the educational plan you have outlined.

What Goes in an Alaska Homeschool ILP

While specific forms vary by program, a typical Alaska correspondence school ILP covers the following components:

Student information. Grade level, enrollment date, and basic identifying information.

Subject areas and curriculum. For each core subject area — math, language arts, science, social studies — you list what curriculum or materials you plan to use. This does not need to be a complete textbook catalog; program names and general descriptions are typical. If you are using a packaged curriculum, you list it here. If you are taking an eclectic approach with multiple resources, a brief description of each subject's approach works.

Educational goals. For each subject or for the year overall, you describe what you are working toward. These can be broad — "develop fluency in multi-digit multiplication and introduction to fractions" for a fourth-grader's math section — rather than precise learning objectives. Programs generally do not require goals written to professional teaching standards.

Planned activities and learning methods. Some programs ask how instruction will be delivered — will you use online programs, textbooks, hands-on projects, field trips, co-op classes, or some combination? This section also ties into allotment planning, since activities that require purchases need to be in the ILP to support expense approval.

Assessment approach. How will you assess your child's progress? Portfolio documentation, standardized testing, advisor check-ins, and parent-created assessments are all common answers. Different programs have different requirements here, and your advisor will tell you what their program expects.

The ILP and Allotment Approval

There is a practical connection between your ILP and your allotment spending that first-year families sometimes miss. When you submit an expense claim for curriculum or materials, the district's approval process often looks at whether the purchase connects to what is documented in your ILP.

A straightforward example: if your ILP lists a specific online math program as your math curriculum, a subscription purchase for that program will be approved without friction. If you later decide to switch to a different program and submit a purchase request for it, you may need to update your ILP to reflect the change before the expense can be approved.

This is not a loophole or a compliance trap — it is how the system is designed. The ILP is the plan; the allotment funds the plan. When your plan changes, updating the ILP keeps your spending aligned with your documentation and avoids complications at review time.

What Happens If Your Plans Change

Life does not always follow the plan you wrote in September. Curriculum that seemed perfect in theory turns out to be the wrong fit in practice. A child's interests shift. A family situation changes. ILPs can be updated.

The process for updating an ILP varies by program, but generally involves informing your advisory teacher of the change and completing whatever amendment form or documentation the program requires. Most programs are accommodating of mid-year changes, especially for curriculum switches, because the goal is for the child to have an appropriate education — not to hold families to plans that no longer serve them.

Significant changes — switching from one correspondence program to another, withdrawing from correspondence school entirely, or changing a child's grade level — are bigger decisions that may involve re-enrollment paperwork or other steps beyond an ILP amendment.

ILPs and the Alexander Litigation

Since the Alexander v. State of Alaska ruling in 2024, the ILP has taken on additional significance as a compliance document. The ongoing litigation has focused attention on how districts authorize and oversee allotment spending, and the ILP is central to that oversight process.

Districts that are defendants in the litigation — Anchorage, Mat-Su, Galena, and Denali — are under particularly close scrutiny regarding whether their review processes are constitutionally adequate. Part of what "adequate review" means is that the ILP accurately reflects what families are actually doing educationally, and that allotment purchases connect to documented educational plans.

For most families conducting a genuine, good-faith homeschool program, this does not change anything. The ILP requirement has always been there. The difference post-Alexander is that advisors and district administrators are paying more attention to whether the documentation is accurate and whether spending is consistent with it.

Independent Homeschoolers Do Not Use ILPs

One important distinction worth noting: if you choose to homeschool under Option 1 as an independent homeschooler — filing directly with the state rather than enrolling in a correspondence program — you are not required to develop an ILP. Independent homeschoolers in Alaska face minimal oversight requirements and do not work with an advisory teacher.

The tradeoff is that independent homeschoolers receive no allotment funding. The ILP requirement exists specifically within the correspondence school framework because the state is allocating public funds and needs documentation that those funds are supporting legitimate educational activity.

If you are weighing the choice between correspondence school enrollment and independent homeschooling, understanding what each path requires — including the ILP and allotment processes — is part of making that decision well. The Alaska Legal Withdrawal Blueprint covers both paths in full, including the documentation each requires, the legal framework governing each, and how to structure your approach for the situation that fits your family.

Making the ILP Work for You

For most families, the ILP is not a burden — it is a useful planning exercise. Sitting down at the start of the year to think through your curriculum choices, your goals for each subject, and how you will document progress is something thoughtful homeschool parents do anyway. Formalizing it in a document that you review with your advisory teacher just adds a layer of external perspective that many families find helpful.

The advisory teacher relationship is one of the genuine benefits of correspondence school enrollment. A good advisor knows the program's resources and vendor list, understands the allotment process, and can help you make the most of the funding available for your child's education. The ILP is the starting point for that relationship each year.

See more United States homeschool guides →